
See Chronology of Blow Records for transcripts of the citations and much more detailed explanations of the referenced records below.
1.
George Blow (? – c1666/7)
We don’t know when he arrived in Virginia, or when he was born, though he may
have been the same person as either of two headrights claimed by persons
patenting land within several miles of where we first find him.[1] By early 1661 he
seems to have been established in the northeastern part of Surry County. On 2
May 1661 George Blow “of Surry County”, was given security for a bond.[2] A few months
later, again as a resident of Surry, he bought and then promptly sold a small
piece of land in the area of Lower Chipoakes Creek.[3] He obtained a
patent in 1663 for 600 acres just off Green Swamp, a few miles southwest of the
area in which he was first found, using several headrights that had already
been used nearly thirty years earlier by a neighbor.[4] He sold parts of
that patent to John Bynum and to Rowland Hudson and William Hancock almost
immediately[5],
but retained a portion of it on which he evidently lived until his death. His
wife Margaret [Margery] relinquished dower in both sales and George Blow signed
his name to both deeds. He then obtained a second patent, which is unrecorded
but referenced later, for an additional 635 acres a few miles southwest.[6] He was evidently
the guardian for an orphan, possibly John Phipps, in 1662 but appear to have
been replaced by 1667.[7]
He evidently died in the late 1660s, a period for which no probate records
survive.
He is mentioned in the Surry records seven times in the three-year period from
mid-1661 to mid-1664, but is not mentioned again after August 1664 (though his
land is mentioned in a few patents). He may have died as early as 1665. He almost
certainly died prior to June 1668, as he does not appear among the Surry
tithables for 1668, 1669, or 1670. A 1675 record, calling Richard Smith the
father-in-law of Richard Blow, is the only record that George Blow’s widow Margaret
had remarried to Richard Smith, though she probably had done so several years
earlier. Margaret was dead by late 1678, when Richard Smith remarried to the
widow of John Twyford.[8]
It is possible she was dead by 1675, because there is no record that her dower
share of the estate was withheld from her sons.
Sometime during
that second marriage, she had a daughter named Elizabeth by her second husband.
The three sons
of Richard Smith are clearly by his next wife.[9]
Richard, the eldest Blow son, appears as a tithable of Richard Smith from
1673-75, and again in 1680, 1681, and in 1683. From 1677 through 1679 he had
his own household. From records in 1675 it is clear that Richard Smith had
been the guardian of both Blow sons prior to that year. Since George Blow
likely died intestate, his land was inherited by the eldest son Richard, and
his estate (the personal property) was split between the two sons.
Little is known of Margaret Blow.
She appears in
only two records, in 1663 and 1664, though her remarriage to Richard Smith is
inferred from a later record, as is he daughter Elizabeth by that marriage. Note
that the 10-year gap between the births of the two sons suggests the
possibility that either they had different mothers or there were other children
who did not survive.
1.1. Richard Blow
(1654 - 1687) He was clearly the eldest son by several years. Richard Blow
was living with Richard Smith in the tithables of 1673-1675.[10] He apparently reached
majority 4 by October 1675 when, as “son and heir of George Blow” he renewed his
father’s 1664 patent for 635 acres.[11]
A month later (at the next available court on 2 November 1675), he petitioned
the court to have his “father in law” Richard Smith deliver to him his share of
his deceased father’s estate.[12]
Oddly, though, he did not acknowledge receipt for nearly two years, doing so in
September 1677.[13]
On 7 May 1678 he sold the entire 635 acre repatented tract.[14] From 1677 through
1679 he appears alone in the tithables lists, apparently living on the
remaining portion of his father’s 1663 patent and enumerated in Lawnes Creek
parish. In early 1680 he sold 100 acres remaining from that original 1663 patent
to Nicholas Sessums.[15]
Later that year, evidently landless, he again appears in Richard Smith’s
household in the 1680 tithables. He bought land on Pidgeon Swamp in early 1681[16], but was still in
Richard Smith’s household in 1681 and in1683 - he appears with William Edwards
in 1682. On 20 April 1684, Richard Blow patented 210 acres on Pidgeon Swamp
adjacent Richard Smith and his own land.[17]
By early 1685 his younger brother George Blow had turned 21, and on 2 November
1685 Richard Blow and his wife Elizabeth gifted George Blow the 100 acres he
had bought in 1681.[18]
Richard appeared in the 1684 tithables by himself, and in 1685 and 1686 with
John Bynum Jr. in his household.
Richard Blow was alive for the June 1686 tithables, but was dead by 3 May 1687
when his widow Elizabeth Blow was granted administration of his estate.[19] Richard Blow
died childless, for his brother George inherited his land, declaring himself to
be “the only brother and heir of Richard Blow” when he sold part of that land
on 3 March 1688.[20]
The widow Elizabeth was still “Elizabeth Blow” when she released her dower
interest in that sale.[21]
But by 2 July 1689 she had remarried to Robert Grice, when they sued George
Blow for her dower interest in her late husband’s land. Elizabeth, who
apparently had several children by Robert Grice, may have been the
sister of John and James Bynum. [See
Bynum Note for a more
complete review of the evidence.]
1.2. George Blow II
(c1664 - 1717) When his brother Richard reached 21 in 1675 and obtained his
share of their father’s personal property, Richard Smith posted a new bond for
the guardianship of George Blow alone.[22]
A prior bond was voided at the same time, showing that Smith had been the
guardian at some earlier date. George Blow appears in the tithables for the
first time in 1681 and declared himself to have reached 21 on 3 March 1685 when
he requested that Richard Smith pay him his share of his father’s estate.[23] Prior to
reaching majority, he appears in the tithables of 1681-1684 twice by himself
and twice as a tithable of Mathew Swann.
At the same court at which he requested his share of his father’s estate,
George Blow and his wife Elizabeth were granted administration of the estate of
her former husband, Thomas Barrow.[24]
Thomas Barrow had first appeared in Surry in 1680 buying the land that George
Blow Sr. had sold years earlier to Hancock and Hudson. He was still alive on 4
November 1684 but George Blow had married his widow by 3 March 1685, only four
months later. Thomas Barrow left his widow with two small sons, Edward (c1675)
and Thomas Jr. (c1679) who later appear as tithables of George Blow.
In a two week period in the fall of 1685, George Blow gifted a cow to “my
loving sister Elizabeth Smith” (see below) and was in turn gifted with 100
acres by his brother Richard Blow.[25]
In early 1687 he sold that 100 acres to John Bynum[26] who was listed
with him in the 1687 tithables. As the “only brother and heir of Richard Blow
decd” he sold a portion of his brother’s patent in early 1688[27] and the remainder
in 1690.[28]
Between the two sale, when Richard Blow’s widow remarried Robert Grice, they
successfully sued George Blow over Elizabeth’s dower interest in the land.[29]
This marked the first of many lawsuits against George Blow. A year later, his
securities sued him over his failure to account for the estate of Thomas Barrow.[30] The following
year, he unsuccessfully sued Robert Randall for calling him a “rogue” and
accusing him of killing a steer. “Rogue” may have been a fair description, for
George was sued more or less constantly for the remainder of his life. In 1694
he was convicted of selling trash tobacco, a fairly serious offense at the
time.[31]
Over the last twenty-five years of his life, nearly every mention of him in the
records is a debt suit.[32]
His many creditors sued him on a regular basis for debts he clearly was unable
to pay. His creditors took some drastic steps, including several seizures of his
property and demands for special bail, and he eventually died virtually
penniless and still in debt.
He moved south of the Blackwater, onto Seacock Swamp, sometime after 1701 when
that area was opened for settlement. He probably lived on a patent there which
he obtained in 1702.[33]
On 1 March 1709 a bridge was ordered “over the Seacock by George Blow’s
plantation.”[34]
And on 18 February 1713 his son Richard Blow was appointed overseer of the
highways “from the bridge over the Seacock Swamp near George Blow’s...”
George Blow died in 1717, at roughly the age of 53. On 18 September 1717
administration of his estate was given to Benjamen Chapman, his greatest
creditor.[35]
That is a sure sign that his debts exceeded his estate. His land, of course,
was safe from creditors under the law of the time, and was inherited by his son
Richard Blow.
1.2.1. Richard Blow
(1687-9 - 1762) He does not appear in any tithables through 1703, the last
year they survive. That would seem to place his date of birth after June of
1687, otherwise he should have been taxable in 1703. He appears first on 7
April 1700 when his father made him a gift of a cow and calf – probably George
Blow’s attempt to place his dwindling property beyond the reach of his
creditors.[36]
He next appears as a witness in a suit on 4 November 1707 (for which majority
was not required).[37]
The first certain indication that he had reached majority was his jury service
on 7 November 1710.[38]
Although he was also frequently sued, at least during his father’s lifetime,
Richard Blow reached a degree of status and wealth well beyond his father’s.
He was one of the first churchwardens of Albemarle parish, and owned a
significant amount of land south of the Blackwater. He appears to have lived
in the same area of Seacock Swamp where his father had died, an area that
became Sussex County in 1754. He died in Sussex County, where his will was
dated 3 September 1761 and proved 18 February 1762. The will names a deceased
son Richard Blow and living sons Henry Blow, Michael Blow, Samuel Blow, John
Blow, and Nicholas Blow; daughters Jane Exum, Rebecca Maget, Mary Thomas, Elizabeth
Edwards, and Ann Blount. His children did quite well for themselves, most
becoming moderately wealthy and serving in a variety of public offices.
Richard Blow’s
wife is given in several deeds as Elizabeth, maiden name unknown.
Elizabeth
Blow/Smith??? (? - ?) The daughter was apparently a daughter of
Margaret Blow by her second husband Richard Smith. George Blow made
a gift of a cow to his “loving sister Elizabeth Smith” on 26 October 1685.[39] Whether she
was a full sister or stepsister is uncertain. When the gift was recorded, the
clerk (who may not have been familiar with the bloodlines) entered it as a gift
to “Elizabeth Smith, daughter of Richard Smith.”[40]
The only
conclusion we can draw from these records is that Elizabeth must be a child of
George Blow’s mother and Richard Smith. Although there are two other
possibilities, neither is nearly as plausible. .
There is no evidence that there was a daughter named Rosamond Blow. This is a theory that appears to ignore the evidence. See Rosamond Bynum a Blow? for a complete analysis of the evidence for and against this theory.
[1] Virginia Patent Book 1, p213 and Book 3, p29.
[2] Surry County Deed Book 1, p165. The bond itself is not in the records.
[3] Surry County Deed Book 1, p170 and p184.
[4] Virginia Patent Book 5, p370. Seven of the twelve headrights he used for this grant had been used in 1636 for the patent that George Blow had bought a part of in 1661.
[5] Surry County Deed Book 1, p232 and p246.
[6] The second patent is referenced in Virginia Patent Book 6, p563 and Book 7, p159.
[7] Surry County Deed Book 1, p298
[8] Surry County Order Book 1671-1691, p228, 229, 241
[9] Their first appearance in the tithables tell us that Richard Smith’s sons were born between roughly 1682 and 1687. His daughter Elizabeth’s birth is harder to pin down.
[10] Richard Smith appears in the 1673 and 1674 tithables with a second male tithable who is not named. That was surely Richard Blow who is his second tithable in 1675. The tithables for the years 1671 and 1672 are lost, as is the 1676 list
[11] Virginia Patent Book 6, p563
[12] Surry County Order Book 1671-1691, p106
[13] Ibid., p157
[14] Surry County Deed Book 2, p203
[15] Surry County Order Book 1671-1691, p106 and Davis, p250
[16] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p442. The transaction is referenced later by George Blow.
[17] Virginia Patent Book 7, p372
[18] Surry County Deed Book 3, p41.
[19] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p565-6.
[20] Surry County Deed Book 4, p32.
[21] The widow had a lifetime interest in the land, regardless of who inherited it. She had to release that interest in the sale.
[22] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p106.
[23] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p477.
[24] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p477.
[25] Surry County Deed Book 3, p42 and p41 respectively.
[26] Surry County Deed Book 3, p80.
[27] Surry County Deed Book 4, p32.
[28] Surry County Deed Book 4, p191.
[29] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p710.
[30] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p757.
[31] Surry County Orders 1691-1713, p103 and p109.
[32] Surry County Orders 1691-1713, pp122, 124, 125, 126, 140, 153, 175, 269, 340, 384, 389, 360. Surry County Orders 1713-1718, p25,30, 38, 65. And that’s just some of them.
[33] Virginia Patent Book 9, p497.
[34] Surry County Orders 1691-1713, p320.
[35] Surry County Orders 1713-1718, p125 – see also p125 and 132.
[36] Surry County Deed Book 5, p202.
[37] Surry County Orders 1691-1713, p303.
[38] Surry County Orders 1691-1713, p352.
[39] Surry County Deed Book 3, p42.
[40] Surry County Orders 1671-1691, p493.
Return to Home Page Contact me
Copyright © 2001-2007 Robert W. Baird, All Rights Reserved